Sunday, August 06, 2006

a few points.

  1. I have some sort of temporary employment. Very short term and very boring. But, it pays for rent and food for quite a while. This in addition to my several other gigs.
  2. When I run into other math people who ask what I'm going to do [ie, the grad school question], I'm going to start telling them, "Oh, I'm going to be a millionaire." Tone will depend on who's asking.
  3. Speaking of other gigs, what's the deal with people doing the gigs I do in a supremely horrible manner? For instance. This afternoon one of the neighbors started cutting down a small tree with a friggin' circular saw. Yesterday the other guy on my moving gig was utterly crazy: lifting with his back, carrying things hunched over or bent-over backwards [!], at one point saying, "I can take the dresser myself the rest of the way...". Fortunately, they didn't seem like the sort of folks to be doing much of this sort of labor in the future, so I didn't endeavor to comment on improvements to their form [as if they could possibly last much longer]. Speaking of which, I really should get my own hump straps and cut back the ivy.
  4. One person's insistence on the applicability of certain canons [rightly or wrongly] is not "the spectre of Romanism that [he] thought [he] had escaped," to quote one person opposed. It may be misguided in the instance of that particular canon, but the fact that there are rules is not "Romanism" and if it were, bully for "Romanism". The question is what those rules are. I mean, perhaps the canon about not ordaining those guilty of fornication after their baptism or the canon about not ordaining those married to a divorcee is one of those. I'm not one to say and I wouldn't even begin to have the competence to judge, but it isn't "Romanism" to think it might be. Note this is a debate I have no truck in and am not participating in.
  5. Favorite quote [I forget the exact wording] by a bizarre Protestant of the week: "Orthodox theology isn't nearly so unbiblical as some converts make it out to be."
  6. I ran into "plain and simply dressed Christians" pages the other day. Essentially, that means, "Amish clothing". I was disappointed that they had few examples of men's clothing for sale, however, since Amish men's clothing is fascinating. I lived just north of the Amish, in fact, but never really took notice of the pecularities. Apparently the Amish pants still use the drop-front broadfall pattern: that's pretty old style. I'm not going to pretend the Amish are more holy than we English, but I will say that the men have pretty cool clothes. If I can't buy them, I may have to make them myself.

2 comments:

Caelius said...

1. Romanism consists in dispensing with canons.
2. Anglicanism consists in pretending they don't exist and occasionally enforcing them against your enemies that they might heap burning coals on your head.

Mr. G. Z. T. said...

I suppose once again Anglicanism has picked up something Orthodox that Romanism has dropped, while the Orthodox firmly retain both aspects of the Tradition. I suppose there really is something to be said about it as a via media...