And find my way again, I've lost my way again. The crystal lake, it only laughs, it knows you're just a modern man. It's shining like the chandelier, shining somewhere far away from here.
So I've fled Chicago for the week for the great state of Iowa. I've lost my way again and I am just a modern man.
What else has lost its way: it seems my latest paycheck lost its way to the bank? #@$@#.
The more public musings of Mr. G. Z. T, "A man of mickle name, Renowned much in armes and derring doe."
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
I doubt you or I are one of the two who could understand...
...but the post linked is worth reading.
What we can really be certain about in life is very, very little, and it seems with the passing of time it becomes less and less. Certainty as a sentiment is not the test of faith, deeds are. It is not that we have to lie about our difficulties, our opinions, and our failures in order to believe. The key is to accept them and to keep going. To keep going to Orthros at four in the morning, to keep going to Mass on Sunday even if everything is not perfect, and to keep striving to love even if you know you will fail is how we will make it through this vale of tears. There is no certainty in this: there is only duty and resolve, and that duty and resolve must come from the heart.
Sunday, December 03, 2006
I commented previously...
...on Protestants taking an interest in history ceasing to be Protestant and enjoying reading the works of Protestants who do indeed take an interest in history. I have found a delightful web-log run by Protestants who take a look at history and seemingly aren't ceasing to be Protestant. In the process, they write some delightful articles, like the above. A precis: he criticizes Mark Driscoll, apparently big name, for his publicized approach to sermon writing for its making the sermon the focal point of Christian worship rather than, say, the sacraments or God's Word [I'd throw in: "or God"], which was the focus in historic Christian worship. Incisive, ecumenical, historically-accurate, and, most of all, defends my point of view. Gets the panheresy seal of approval.
More of the same: an article which points to and summarizes a better article which demolishes the Warfield's assertion that, "The Reformation, inwardly considered, was just the ultimate triumph of Augustine’s doctrine of grace over Augustine’s doctrine of the church." Augustine! Defeating sloganeers! Medieval history and theology! Pointers to a longer work on the same! And the discussion below contains several key insights into how these sorts of arguments work and how to get beyond propaganda to the core of the real issues - quite helpful for those whose model for ecumenism is ecumenism by return. Delightful.
Fun folks to read, they even defend us from time to time. Fascinating world they must live in.
One temptation to resist is to use these digested web-logs as substitutes for my own digging into primary sources, or at least good secondary sources. Quite a temptation because, though I have a passing interest in this sort of subject, my time is finite and I have a lot of other stuff to do. John Cassian and Isaac the Syrian are far more important scholarly concerns if I had the time to pretend to be scholarlike, credibility theory if I had the time to pretend to fulfill professional obligations, the Greek Septuagint if I had time to pretend to fulfill etc etc. In short, it's not that high on my priority queue and my spiritual and professional well-being are a bit more important than chasing the references of so many heretics twice or thrice removed from Christ's Church arguing about how far the second leap-frog is from the third.
Maybe I should just be a sandwich delivery biker and devote my time to higher pursuits rather than being an aspiring quaestuary. Or something.
More of the same: an article which points to and summarizes a better article which demolishes the Warfield's assertion that, "The Reformation, inwardly considered, was just the ultimate triumph of Augustine’s doctrine of grace over Augustine’s doctrine of the church." Augustine! Defeating sloganeers! Medieval history and theology! Pointers to a longer work on the same! And the discussion below contains several key insights into how these sorts of arguments work and how to get beyond propaganda to the core of the real issues - quite helpful for those whose model for ecumenism is ecumenism by return. Delightful.
Fun folks to read, they even defend us from time to time. Fascinating world they must live in.
One temptation to resist is to use these digested web-logs as substitutes for my own digging into primary sources, or at least good secondary sources. Quite a temptation because, though I have a passing interest in this sort of subject, my time is finite and I have a lot of other stuff to do. John Cassian and Isaac the Syrian are far more important scholarly concerns if I had the time to pretend to be scholarlike, credibility theory if I had the time to pretend to fulfill professional obligations, the Greek Septuagint if I had time to pretend to fulfill etc etc. In short, it's not that high on my priority queue and my spiritual and professional well-being are a bit more important than chasing the references of so many heretics twice or thrice removed from Christ's Church arguing about how far the second leap-frog is from the third.
Maybe I should just be a sandwich delivery biker and devote my time to higher pursuits rather than being an aspiring quaestuary. Or something.
Saturday, December 02, 2006
etiquette notes
Continuing in my series of etiquette notes.
EDIT: Added "Contraception and Chastity" to the links and created a facebook group about the immorality of contraception.
EDIT: Revised the first point.
- People with Ph.D.'s are not addressed as "Dr". That title is generally only used for medical doctors and, sometimes, if they insist loudly, D.Div.'s, but they really shouldn't be indulged, since the only point of getting that degree is to be called "Dr" when your tradition doesn't let you be called "the Rev. Fr".
- Never inquire about or discuss somebody else's diet/fast [EDIT: or your own, especially your own]. The first rule of fasting club is not to talk about fasting club. And it simply isn't polite to ask if somebody is reducing.
- Quite fortunately, you're not really obligated to get anybody a Christmas gift. But don't go cold turkey: gradually alienate your friends and family first.
- Don't take off your jacket when, for example, wearing evening attire unless you absolutely must [say, if you have to assist a woman giving birth, though if you're qualified to do that, you should've gotten a jacket with cuffs that actually unbutton: it's what they were originally there for]. You're supposed to keep it on.
- Don't throw up on the train. Try to at least make it to the next stop and jump out to the platform.
EDIT: Added "Contraception and Chastity" to the links and created a facebook group about the immorality of contraception.
EDIT: Revised the first point.
Thursday, November 30, 2006
good times
First, I finished The Hobbit. Then I went back to where I live, got a little lucrative project, had a great day at work that'll tide me over for the rest of the week, and am now contemplating eating a delicious sandwich. RESOLVED: life is good.
What is not good: sleeping in instead of going to church today. That it's going to be horribly cold. That's pretty much it.
What is not good: sleeping in instead of going to church today. That it's going to be horribly cold. That's pretty much it.
Monday, November 27, 2006
trilogy: finished
Again. Now the problem is that I really can't talk of anything other than heroism and bizarre details of Tolkien's mythology. Or about how inadequate the movies were in comparison to the book, despite the occasional ham-handedness of Tolkien. They were decent enough movies, if you ignore all that blasted computer-generated drek and the occasionally poor acting, but they simply fail to catch all that can be portrayed in the book. All movies must be selective, true, and I think they made some very fine selections, but I'm just going to say that the books really can't be adequately captured on film. I digress! But seriously: I hope I don't wake up enlisted in the Navy accidentally or something worse as a result of this influx of bold and chivalrous thinking. I'm not sure what could be worse than the Navy, though, since you can't, say, suddenly wake up married or monkish these days from a sudden burst of chivalry.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)