Saturday, November 16, 2013
SO: WHY TALK ABOUT RACE AT ALL? If, then, the Race Question is really a problem for statists and not for paleos, why should we talk about the race matter at all? Why should it be a political concern for us; why not leave the issue entirely to the scientists?TL; DR version: scientific racism disproves the need for economic egalitarianism and justifies inequality. Therefore, it is useful as a weapon against the welfare state project.
Two reasons we have already mentioned; to celebrate the victory of freedom of inquiry and of truth for its own sake; and a bullet through the heart of the egalitarian-socialist project. But there is a third reason as well: as a powerful defense of the results of the free market. If and when we as populists and libertarians abolish the welfare state in all of its aspects, and property rights and the free market shall be triumphant once more, many individuals and groups will predictably not like the end result. In that case, those ethnic and other groups who might be concentrated in lower-income or less prestigious occupations, guided by their socialistic mentors, will predictably raise the cry that free-market capitalism is evil and "discriminatory" and that therefore collectivism is needed to redress the balance. In that case, the intelligence argument will become useful to defend the market economy and the free society from ignorant or self-serving attacks. In short; racialist science is properly not an act of aggression or a cover for oppression of one group over another, but, on the contrary, an operation in defense of private property against assaults by aggressors.
Fine, you can object that this was written in 1944, almost every philosopher at that time had this kind of problem, and it seems separable from the rest of his thought. Presentism should be discouraged. After all, we don't completely discount the statistical views of RA Fisher (unless you're a very strict Bayesian) just because he was a supporter of eugenics and denied the possibility of smoking causing cancer. However, one salient difference is that we do not use his works that go anywhere near his eugenic ideas or his crazy denial of the link between smoking and cancer. We use his math and that is all. With Rothbard, these ideas are harder to extricate.
Oh, wait, that was written in 1994. Less than 20 years ago. So he's just a racist.
Friday, November 15, 2013
Ladies and gentlemen, the surrender caucus at work. They are not only in the surrender caucus, but really need to be locked in room with an actuary who will beat them over the head with a newspaper until they understand how insurance works. Upton's bill was a bit of political theater rather than a real policy proposal and they gladly behaved like the useful idiots they are by signing on to it.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
I haven't heard anybody talking in these terms for at least a year, maybe two. Is it because I have not been looking enough, have been too busy to see, am looking for love in all the wrong places, or is this brand of nonsense dying out and being replaced by other forms of self-loathing? "Behold, I make all things new."
In the moment, I am neptic. Not because of any phony elder's blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my nous.I shouldn't make too much fun, as I don't see people like that and, if I did, at least they're not atheists or Protestants.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Sunday, November 10, 2013
- Paraskevi/Paraskeva. You can use Evi, Eva, Petka, or Friday if you're adventurous and enjoy multilingual puns (or perhaps just translating the story). Pyatnitsa if very adventurous.
- Speaking of Friday, there's Hildegard. Hildy is a very usable shortening of it.
- Winifred is uncommon, but she was a marvelous saint and "Winnie" works well.
- Barsanuphius and Barry/Barney/Bart has already been discussed.
- Photini. I can't think of a way to make this less "exotic" other than making it more common.
- Benedict is somewhat uncommon, but Ben works as a short version that obscures the relative oddness of the name - obscuring it is probably less necessary these days, as certain high profile actors have the name.
- Theodosius, Theoderic, Theodoret, Theodotos etc can, like "Theodore", be shortened to Ted.
- Theophilos, Theophanes, and Theognostos can be turned into Theo.
- Amphilochios, Theophilos, and other -phil- names can be, of course, "Phil".
- Maximos is a little odd, according to some, but "Max" is not unprecedented. Makarios could also be similarly shortened.
- Hyacinth could be Jack.
- Turbo. No modification.
- Gerasimos, Germanos, and other modifications could be referred to as "Jerry".
- Nikon, Nikephoros, Nikodemos, Nikander, Nikanor, Nikitas (the Goth), or even Nektarios could all be "Nick". Nektarios could also be "Terry".
- Wilfred or Wilibrord could pass as "Will".
- Remigius is already commonly abbreviated as Rémy, and I think that sounds fine, albeit French.